This on-line publication is an exemplar of
one of the localities included in an upcoming volume of the North American Journal
of Lepidoptera Biodiversity.This
volume will present detailed biodiversity inventory data and analysis for 44
days of field work conducted in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Missouri, Tennessee,
Virginia, West Virginia, Kentucky, Mississippi, and Indiana between 1 June and
16 August 2002.The data from this
project includes at least 12,219 unique Lepidoptera records for 951 species in
the included families, and will be presented for each locality in a format
comparable to that presented for TombigbeeState Park below.Those who would be interested in receiving
e-mail notification of when this volume is published should contact the senior
author at hkonsjr@yahoo.com, to be placed on an e-mail notification list for NAJLB
volumes.Placement on this list
constitutes no obligation to purchase any NAJLB volumes and is for notification
purposes only.
Abstract:We present the detailed Lepidoptera biodiversity inventory data
obtained from two survey dates at TombigbeeState Park in mid July of
2002.We present 295 unique species
records for 190 species, including 179 species of Macrolepidoptera.
Introduction:TombigbeeState Park is located in Lee County, Mississippi.The predominant habitat types in the park are
mesic hardwood forest and xeric oak-pine forest.Carya(hickories)
are common in the mesic hardwood forest
habitats.We found some small areas of
wetland in the park, including a small sedge meadow.There are ravines with small streams.The sides of the ravines are forested slopes
with mesic hardwood forest, except for the
aforementioned sedge meadow.A lake is
present with some cypress growing along the edge.Arundinaria (cane) occurs in some of the mesic
hardwood forest habitat, especially along the ravines.Other Lepidopterists have previously visited TombigbeeState Park, but to our knowledge species
lists have not yet been published from their work.
Methods:Our surveys were conducted with MV sheets, UV
traps, a bait trail, tapping trees, and diurnal collecting with nets and
jars.Follow this
link for illustrations and a discussion of these survey methods.The following tables provide the dates and
locations of our survey stations, and information on weather conditions when
surveys were conducted.At each survey
station on each survey date we attempted to document all species encountered in
the included families.HLK stayed up all
night each night monitoring the MV sheet and bait trail.
The temperature the night of 14 July 2002 ranged from
75-72°F, and the moon was 18% illuminated.On 16 July 2002 the temperature ranged from 80-75ºF, with the moon 39% illuminated.
Voucher Specimens:At least one voucher specimen substantiates all unique species
records.A unique species record is the
collection of one or more specimens of a species from one survey station on one
survey date.Voucher specimens are
currently in the personal research collections of the authors or in the MilwaukeePublicMuseum.All voucher specimens were determined by the
senior author.
Results:The following table, taken from a draft of our upcoming NAJLB
volume on our mid latitude eastern U.S. surveys, presents the detailed
Lepidoptera biodiversity inventory data for the included families at TombigbeeState Park.The columns of this table can be cross
referenced with the above table to get the detailed information for each survey
station.The “USR” column gives the
number of unique species records for each species.The total column has the cells checked for
all of the species we recorded among our TombigbeeState Park
surveys, and gives the total number of species recorded in each category,
including 190 species recorded from all of the included families and 179
species of Macrolepidoptera.The table includes 295 unique species
records.Numbers to the left of the
species names correspond to the Hodges et al. (1983) check list, and serve as a
citation for the author and date of description for each species included in
that publication.
Discussion:TombigbeeState Park has a diverse
fauna for hickory associated Catocalaspecies.When we were conducting our surveys few
individuals of these species came to lights and none came to bait.However, many individuals were found on tree
trunks with the tapping method.Euparthenosnubiliswas
also found by this method, and exhibited a behavior of flying between tree
trunks similar to Catocalaspecies.Collecting voucher specimens of the diurnally
active Catocalaproved difficult at TombigbeeState Park
at the time we were there.Most
individuals were very wary and difficult to approach, and often flew long
distances when disturbed.Also, many
individuals were landing high in the trees out of reach of our nets.Furthermore, the ravine area was often
difficult to navigate due to many vines with large thorns, dense understory
vegetation, and/or steep and uneven ground.Under the hot and sunny conditions when we were tapping, individuals of
the diurnally active Catocala
were concentrated in hardwood forest habitat in low lying areas (especially
along the ravine), and few individuals were seen in the more upland areas.
Most of the
species we recorded from TombigbeeState Park, other than
the hickory associated Catocala,
are probably widespread habitat generalists.We hypothesize this based on the north Florida habitat data and analysis presented
in Kons and Borth
(2006).Our experience collecting in
eastern Texas
suggests habitat dependency of Lepidoptera species in northern Florida and eastern Texas is probably quite
similar, so we would extrapolate that this applies to Mississippi as well, at least regarding
habitat types that also occur in Florida.
The
following species we recorded from TombigbeeState Park are
potentially dependent on hardwood forest habitats: Callosamiaangulifera, Catocalapiatrix, C. epione, C. flebilis, C. angusi, C. obscura, C. ulalume, C. dejecta, C. insolabilis, C. vidua, C. maestosa, and C. lacrymosa.All of these species are reported to
utilize Caryaas a larval host (Covell
1984, Rings et al. 1992) except for Callosamiaangulifera, which utilizes Liriodendron tulipifera (Tuskes et al. 1986).One potentially wetland dependent species was found, Cutinadistincta, which is potentially
dependent on cypress habitats (Kons and Borth 2006).This
species is widespread in cypress habitats in Florida and Texas, and probably in Mississippi as well.Two species were recorded from single
specimens that we would not have expected in TombigbeeState Park
habitats.We usually only find Hyparpax aurora and Cistheneunifascia in xeric habitats that are at
least partially open (such as prairies, oak savannas, or barrens), but we do
also have one Florida
specimen of H. aurora from hardwood
forest habitat (JacksonCounty).
A few
species were recorded from our surveys which are poorly known in our
experience.Perhaps the most notable
find was Oxycillamalaca.Among our surveys we have found this species
only at TombigbeeState Park and AtlantaState Park in Cass County, Texas.We do not know why this species is so seldom
encountered.Grammiafigurata is also a notable find in
eastern North America in our experience,
although we have no data to suggest this species is very particular in
habitat.Our scattered records are from
a variety of different habitat types, including old field in Indiana.
The mid
summer flight date of the record of Acronictanoctivaga is interesting.In both Wisconsin and Florida this species is univoltine
and flies earlier in the season before any Catocala adults are present.
There does
not appear to be a steep gradient of change in the Macrolepidoptera
fauna between the latitude of Lee County Mississippi and the Florida panhandle, at least with respect to
the habitat types and time of year where/when we conducted our TombigbeeState Park surveys.Approximately 90.4% of the Macrolepidoptera species we recorded at Tombigbee State
Park are species for which we have also collected or examined specimens from
northern Florida (see check list in Kons and Borth (2006)).However, several of the hickory associated Catocalawe found at Tombigbee State Park may not range as far south as
northern Florida, including: Catocalaflebilis, C. angusi, and C. obscura.
Our rotting
fruit bait hardly attracted any Lepidoptera during our TombigbeeState Park
surveys.The first night our bait
attracted zero individuals, and on the second night it only attracted two
individuals and species.The
effectiveness of this bait is highly variable spatially and temporally, and
bait is often poorly effective during the mid summer (rainy season) in northern
Florida (Kons and Borth 2006).When bait is working well it can attract many
Catocala
individuals and species.Kons and Borth (2006) reported
that the variation in bait effectiveness often does not appear to be related to
the abundance of Lepidoptera.
Our species
counts for our Tombigbee State Park MV sheet and UV trap samples were not
particularly high.Our MV sheet was
located right near an area where many Catocalawere seen
during the day, but very few individuals came to the lights at night.One of our UV traps did surprisingly
poor.It was located in an area which
appeared to have very good habitat upslope from a ravine with mesic hardwood forest and cane.We have often done quite well trapping in this
type of habitat in northern Florida
(although primarily earlier in the season), but we were baffled that this trap
only collected eight species of Macrolepidoptera.Our other UV trap, also located in mesic hardwood forest, did much better and collected 54
species of Macrolepidoptera.
A
substantial portion of the Lepidoptera species which were present at the time
our surveys were conducted may not have been documented by our surveys, as
inferred by an analysis of the portion of species we recorded from n or fewer
unique species records.Our analyses of
biodiversity blitz data sets from localities where we conducted intensive
collecting over five or more consecutive days suggests that the percentages of
species recorded from n or fewer unique species records decrease in relation to
an increase in the proportion of the species present which have been
documented.This is based on survey data
derived from an attempt to document each species encountered at each survey
station on each survey date.
The below
figure shows the percentages of Macrolepidoptera
species recorded from n or fewer unique species records among our Tombigbee
State Park surveys.There are six
possible unique species records for nocturnal species (2 MV sheet samples, two
UV trap samples, and two bait trail samples), and two possible unique species
records for diurnal species.The bait
trail samples have little bearing on the analysis as our bait only attracted
two individual moths over two nights.Over half of the Macrolepidoptera species we
recorded (58.4%) were recorded from only one unique species record,
and 85.8% of the species were recorded from only one or two unique species
records.In upcoming NAJLB volumes will
elaborate more on the potential of this type of data for predicting what
proportion of the possible species were actually recorded.Compare the below figure to comparable
figures we show in our on-line Kingdom Come State Park report, where we
hypothesize we did a much more thorough job documenting the species present at
the time of our surveys.
Acknowledgments:Richard
Brown of the MississippiStateUniversity
was extremely helpful with our survey work in Mississippi.He enlisted us research associates of the MississippiEntomologicalMuseum, providing us with
authorization to conduct Lepidoptera surveys in Mississippi State Parks.He also hosted us for a visit to the
Mississippi State University Lepidoptera collection (an outstanding Lepidoptera
collection for Mississippi
and surrounding areas), provided us with distributional and phenology
data for Mississippi Lepidoptera, and took us to collect at several private
properties in Mississippi.We thank the staff of TombigbeeState Park
for their courtesy and cooperation with our research.The senior author also thanks David Wahl and
the American Entomological Institute for infrastructural support and a flexible
work schedule.Hugo & Sharon Kons, Sr. assisted with building light and bait traps and
provided other support.Several people
assisted with acquiring chemicals important to our research, including Niklaus Hostettler, Jim Lloyd, and Robert Robbins.
References
Covell,
Charles V. Jr.1984.A Field Guide to the Moths
of Eastern North America.Boston,
Massachusetts, Houghton Mifflin
Company.496 pp.
Hodges,
Ronald W. et. al.1983.Check List of the Lepidoptera of America North of Mexico.Great Britian,
University Press, Cambridge.
Kons, Hugo L. Jr. and Robert J. Borth.2006.Contributions to a study of the diversity,
distribution, habitat association, andphenology of the
Lepidoptera of Northern Florida.North American Journal of Lepidoptera Biodiversity.Volume I: 1-231.